This page compares tcollector to alternative metrics collection tools.
| Tool | Best For | Backend | Language | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| tcollector | OpenTSDB | OpenTSDB only | Python | Maintenance |
| Telegraf | Modern deployments | 50+ | Go | Very Active |
| Prometheus | Cloud-native | Native | Go | Very Active |
| collectd | Low-resource | Many | C | Active |
✅ Choose tcollector when:
❌ Consider alternatives when:
Best for: Modern deployments, multiple backends
| Feature | tcollector | Telegraf |
|---|---|---|
| Backend | OpenTSDB only | 50+ outputs |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Plugins | Scripts | 200+ inputs |
| Status | Maintenance | Very Active |
Migration path: Telegraf has OpenTSDB output for migration.
Best for: Cloud-native, pull-based
| Feature | tcollector | Prometheus |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Push | Pull |
| Backend | OpenTSDB | Native TSDB |
| Tags | Yes | Yes (labels) |
| Query | OpenTSDB API | PromQL |
Migration path: Use Prometheus exporters instead of collectors.
For new deployments: Choose Telegraf or Prometheus depending on your needs.
For existing tcollector users: Consider migrating to Telegraf if you need more backends, or stay with tcollector if OpenTSDB meets your needs.
Any questions?
Feel free to contact us. Find all contact information on our contact page.